In a groundbreaking ruling, India’s Supreme Court has reaffirmed the importance of adhering to judicial procedures, declaring that any court order issued without the Chief Justice of a High Court’s authorization is null and void.

Background of the Case

The dispute began with a writ petition filed in 2016 by workers of Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Limited (GRSE Ltd.), seeking compassionate appointments after the death of their colleagues. Despite specific policies in place to support dependents, GRSE Ltd. denied the petitioners relief, prompting them to take legal action.

The Supreme Court’s Decision

A bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Rajesh Bindal delivered the landmark judgment in Civil Appeal No. 3243 of 2025. The court set aside a Calcutta High Court order dated September 4, 2024, citing lack of jurisdiction. This decision underscores the significance of the Chief Justice’s authority as the master of the roster.

Implications and Future Directions

This landmark judgment has significant implications for India’s judicial system, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established procedures and jurisdictional requirements. As the Supreme Court continues to uphold the rule of law and ensure the integrity of the judicial process, this decision serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of procedural compliance.